The Patenters - חברה לרישום פטנטים

Handling a Notice before examination from the ILPTO

Handling a Notice before examination from the ILPTO


We recently argued with a client over payment for work on a Notice before examination.  We thought  it would be best to clarify several things about the prosecution of patent applications in Israel.  In particular regarding the examination process in comparison to other jurisdictions, and how our firm works.

Office action = Notice before exam??

Wikipedia defines an office action as “a document written by an examiner in a patent or trademark examination procedure and mailed to an applicant [1] for a patent or trademark“.  

Strictly formally speaking, the Notice isn’t written by an examiner. 
It is a standard letter that is the same for all patent applicants. 
However, it certainly requires a substantial response from the applicant. 
In my opinion it thus is indeed an office action.

Request for exam?

Essentially the Notice is most similar to a request for examination that is
common in other jurisdictions.  A response to the Notice in effect initiates
the examination process. 

Minimal response to Notice before exam 

At a minimum, the Applicant must provide as part of the response a list of
publications that are relevant to the invention.  This feature is akin to an IDS in
US patent applications.  In addition a list of corresponding patent applications
from the same family, i.e., in other jursidictions, must be provided. 
This feature is similar to the procedure in Indian patent applications.

Timing the Notice before examination in Israel patent applications

Request for examination is not possible in Israel. 
The option is not available.  Instead, the applicant must wait for the Israeli
Patent Office to issue the Notice before Examination.  The Israeli Patent
Office is very eager to expedite the examination process.  Nevertheless,
a Notice might issue only after three years or more since the filing date of
national phase into Israel.  Moreover, several additional years might pass after
responding to the Notice and until the first office action
of merits issues (“Notice of deficiencies”).

To greatly expedite the process, and indeed in our opinion improve the
chances of obtaining a patent, a request for PPH prosecution may be filed. 
Even together with the filing of the application.  If the request is approved then
a Notice automatically ensues a short time afterwards.   Alternatively,
a request for PPH prosecution may be filed as part of the response to
the Notice before examination whenever this issues.

Charges for handling a Notice before examination

Whatever route the applicant chooses, the request for PPH prosecution
is one procedure we charge for. The response to the Notice is another, separate one.

That being said, we are very cost-concious. 
We are aware that many firms charge an arm and a leg for
requesting examination (even without doing any “extra” tasks). 
We charge a low fee for requesting PPH prosecution. 
This is because we believe that it is in the best interest of the client,
although purely optional.  We want to encourage its usage as the client’s
success is our own.  Similar considerations apply to our response to the Notice. 
That is largely a paralegal’s work we can charge by the hour. 
For most responses the resultant cost is a few hundred US dollars.


Additional reading

See this article 

Arranging the patent application claims in Israel

More articles